Skip to content

Check your ICM readiness

See whether your commission, bonus, and variable pay processes are still manageable in spreadsheets — or whether it’s time for a more governed incentive compensation setup.

Most companies score below 45. See where you stand.

Check your ICM score

2-minute assessment • Instant score • No email required
Instant score
No email required
Built for Finance, RevOps, and GTM leaders
ICM readiness checklist visual

What ICM readiness means

Incentive compensation becomes harder to manage when commission plans, bonus rules, approvals, and payout calculations start living across multiple spreadsheets. For many teams, that is the point where visibility drops, disputes increase, and month-end processes become difficult to trust. If you are evaluating your current incentive compensation management setup, this checklist helps you benchmark how mature your process really is.

A low score usually means your team is still relying on manual logic, fragmented ownership, or unclear controls. That often shows up in delayed payouts, weak auditability, or inconsistent reporting. Teams reviewing sales commission structures, quota logic, or approval workflows can use this assessment as a fast first check before deciding whether they need dedicated incentive compensation software.

This assessment is especially useful if your pay programs combine commissions with bonuses, SPIFs, or more complex OTE models. It gives you a quick view of where your biggest operational risk sits, and what to improve next.

Take the assessment

 Answer a few quick questions to see how ready your organization is for a more scalable ICM process. 

Question 1 of 8 0 of 8 answered
1. Are commission calculations still managed primarily in spreadsheets?
2. Do multiple teams edit or approve payout data manually?
3. Is it difficult to explain exactly how a payout was calculated?
4. Do reps or managers frequently question payout accuracy?
5. Are commissions, bonuses, or SPIFs managed in separate files or workflows?
6. Is payout reporting slow or hard to access?
7. Are plan changes difficult to roll out consistently?
8. Do Finance, RevOps, and Sales lack a shared real-time view of incentives?

2-minute assessment • Instant score • No email required

What this score means for your team

Finance

A lower score usually means more month-end friction, weaker controls, and higher audit risk around variable pay.

RevOps

A lower score often signals fragmented plan logic, slow plan changes, and limited visibility into payout mechanics.

Sales leadership

When ICM maturity is low, trust in the compensation process tends to drop, especially when reps cannot easily understand how payouts were calculated.

HR / Compensation

A low score can indicate inconsistent incentive governance, limited documentation, and weak alignment between pay design and operational execution.

What to do next 

If your score is low or mid-range, the next step is usually not “buy software immediately.” It is understanding where manual processes are introducing risk first, and which parts of your compensation workflow should be standardized before scaling.

For most teams, the biggest gains come from replacing spreadsheet calculations, improving approval flow, and giving Finance, RevOps, and Sales a shared source of truth.

Explore incentive compensation software

Understand how Bentega supports scalable incentive processes.

See pricing

Review Bentega pricing if you are already comparing solutions.

Book a demo

Walk through your score and get practical recommendations.

Ready to improve your ICM process?

See how Bentega helps teams improve commissions, bonuses, and variable pay off spreadsheets and into a more scalable workflow.