---
title: "Sales Activity Metrics: What to Track and Incentivise"
description: Learn which sales activity metrics to track, when calls and meetings should affect incentives, and how to avoid rewarding activity without quality.
image: https://www.bentega.io/hubfs/Canva%20images/Activity%20Metrics.png
---

[Skip to content](https://www.bentega.io/blog/boost-sales-the-importance-of-activity-metrics-in-saas-businesses#main-content)

[![Bentega.io incentive compensation management logo](https://www.bentega.io/hubfs/Bentega%20wordmark%20navbar_1000x100.svg)](https://www.bentega.io/)

- [Product](https://www.bentega.io/product)
- Solutions

    - [By role](https://www.bentega.io/solutions)

          - [CFOs & Finance](https://www.bentega.io/solutions/cfos-finance-incentive-control)
          - [Sales & RevOps](https://www.bentega.io/solutions/sales-revops-incentive-compensation)
          - [HR & People](https://www.bentega.io/solutions/hr-people-variable-pay-governance)
          - [GTM Teams](https://www.bentega.io/solutions/gtm-leaders-incentive-compensation)

                  - [Customer Success](https://www.bentega.io/use-cases/customer-success-incentives)
- [Pricing](https://www.bentega.io/pricing)
- [Services](https://www.bentega.io/services)
- Resources

    - [Guides](https://www.bentega.io/compensation-sales-performance-guides-free-downloads-bentega)

          - [Incentive Compensation](https://www.bentega.io/incentive-compensation)
          - [Incentive Compensation Management (ICM)](https://www.bentega.io/incentive-compensation-management)
          - [Sales Compensation](https://www.bentega.io/sales-compensation)
          - [Sales Commission](https://www.bentega.io/sales-commission)
          - [Commission Structures](https://www.bentega.io/sales-commission-structure)
          - [Bonus](https://www.bentega.io/bonus)
          - [Performance Pay](https://www.bentega.io/performance-pay)
          - [SPIF](https://www.bentega.io/spif)
          - [On-Target Earnings](https://www.bentega.io/on-target-earnings)
          - [KPIs and Metrics](https://www.bentega.io/kpis-and-metrics)
          - [Motivation](https://www.bentega.io/work-motivation)
          - [Incentive Compensation Governance](https://www.bentega.io/incentive-compensation-governance)
    - [Blog](https://www.bentega.io/blog)
    - [Glossary](https://www.bentega.io/glossary)
    - Tools

          - [OTE Calculator](https://www.bentega.io/tools/ote-calculator)
          - [Sales Commission Calculator](https://www.bentega.io/sales-commission-calculator)
    - [Newsletter](https://www.bentega.io/newsletter)
- About

    - [About Bentega](https://www.bentega.io/about)
    - [Contact Us](https://www.bentega.io/contact-us-bentega)

[Log in](https://app.bentega.io/) [Book a demo →](https://www.bentega.io/demo)

 Sep 9, 2024

# Sales activity metrics: what should you track and incentivise?

![Picture of Andreas S. Loktu](https://app.hubspot.com/settings/avatar/3f41a5dd11434c453a87cb1de7df2224) [Andreas S. Loktu](https://www.bentega.io/blog/author/andreas-s-loktu)

Share: [facebook-f icon](http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=https://www.bentega.io/blog/boost-sales-the-importance-of-activity-metrics-in-saas-businesses) [linkedin-in icon](http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https://www.bentega.io/blog/boost-sales-the-importance-of-activity-metrics-in-saas-businesses) [X Twitter icon](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https://www.bentega.io/blog/boost-sales-the-importance-of-activity-metrics-in-saas-businesses) [envelope icon](mailto:?body=https://www.bentega.io/blog/boost-sales-the-importance-of-activity-metrics-in-saas-businesses)

Calls, emails, meetings, demos and follow-ups are some of the easiest Sales metrics to measure. They are also easy for salespeople to influence. That makes activity metrics useful for understanding whether enough commercial activity is taking place, diagnosing problems in the sales process and coaching individual representatives.

It does not automatically make them good compensation metrics.

Once variable pay is attached to an activity, the employee has a financial reason to produce more of that activity. If the metric measures volume without enough consideration for quality, the incentive can work exactly as designed while producing a result the company did not actually want.

The key distinction is between **using Sales activity to understand performance** and **paying people for producing the activity itself**.

For a broader comparison of Sales metrics that may affect compensation, see our [guide to Sales KPIs for incentive compensation](https://www.bentega.io/blog/driving-sales-success-harnessing-sales-kpis-and-incentives-for-optimal-performance).

![Activity Metrics](https://www.bentega.io/hs-fs/hubfs/Canva%20images/Activity%20Metrics.png?width=960&height=540&name=Activity%20Metrics.png)

## Sales activity metrics: definition and examples

Sales activity metrics measure actions taken during the commercial process rather than the final commercial outcome.

Common examples include:

- outbound calls;
- emails sent;
- prospect conversations;
- meetings booked;
- meetings completed;
- demos conducted;
- follow-up activities;
- opportunities created;
- proposals sent;
- other defined sales actions.

These differ from outcome metrics such as:

- new ARR;
- revenue;
- gross margin;
- sales target attainment;
- closed-won deals;
- expansion revenue.

Activity metrics tell you something about **what Sales is doing**. Outcome metrics tell you more about **what those activities ultimately produced**.

Both can be valuable, but they answer different questions.

## Why Sales activity metrics are useful

Imagine that a salesperson finishes the month substantially below target. Revenue alone tells the Sales manager that performance was weak. It does not explain why.

Activity data can help investigate.

- Perhaps the salesperson had too few qualified conversations.
- Perhaps they generated enough meetings but very few progressed into opportunities.
- Perhaps opportunities were created but conversion later in the process was poor.

Or perhaps activity was healthy and the problem lies elsewhere, such as pricing, product fit, sales cycle length or pipeline inherited from an earlier period. That makes activity metrics particularly useful for **diagnosis and coaching**.

They give managers more information about the process behind the result.

## Activity metrics are leading indicators, not guarantees

Sales activity often occurs before the outcome the company ultimately wants.

A call may lead to a conversation. A conversation may lead to a meeting. A meeting may become an opportunity. An opportunity may eventually become revenue. That makes activity useful as a leading indicator. But the relationship is not guaranteed.

Consider two salespeople.

### Salesperson A

100 calls  
20 relevant conversations  
8 qualified meetings  
3 opportunities

### Salesperson B

150 calls  
10 relevant conversations  
3 qualified meetings  
1 opportunity

Salesperson B has more activity according to the simplest metric: calls made. But Salesperson A appears to be producing more progress from fewer calls.

If the company rewards call volume alone, the incentive may favour the wrong result. This is why activity metrics are most useful when viewed together with what happens next.

## Common sales activity metrics and when to incentivise them

### Calls made

Call volume can help managers understand whether outbound activity is taking place.

If an SDR consistently makes very few calls compared with the rest of the team, that may be relevant information. But calls are usually an input rather than the commercial outcome.

Paying directly for call volume creates an obvious incentive:

**make more calls.**

That may be appropriate in a very specific campaign or operating environment, but the company should understand what the metric does not capture.

It does not necessarily tell you:

- whether the prospect fits the ICP;
- whether anyone answered;
- whether a useful conversation occurred;
- whether the conversation progressed;
- whether an opportunity was created.

Call volume can therefore be extremely useful for management without needing to determine variable pay.

### Emails sent

Email volume has the same characteristic. It is easy to measure and easy to increase. But sending more emails does not necessarily mean creating more commercial value.

Automation makes this even more important. A salesperson may be able to increase email volume significantly without a corresponding increase in meaningful prospect engagement.

For coaching purposes, managers may look at volume together with measures such as:

- replies;
- relevant responses;
- conversations created;
- meetings booked;
- opportunities generated.

That allows the company to understand whether email activity is contributing to the intended commercial process rather than treating the volume itself as the end result.

### Meetings booked

Meetings are closer to a meaningful commercial outcome.

For many SDR and business-development roles, generating relevant meetings may be an explicit part of the job. That can make meetings a legitimate candidate for variable compensation. The important word is **relevant**.

Imagine an SDR earns:

**€50 per booked meeting**

and books 20 meetings.

The incentive payout would be:

**20 × €50 = €1,000**

If all 20 meetings are equally valuable under the plan, the SDR has a clear economic reason to maximise the number of bookings.

Now assume Sales later determines that only eight meetings involved relevant companies and appropriate buyer profiles.

The activity metric worked. The definition of what deserved incentive credit may not have.

#### Define what qualifies before attaching pay

One way to address this is to define a qualified activity.

For example, a meeting might only receive incentive credit when it satisfies defined requirements such as:

- the account matches specified customer criteria;
- the participant has an appropriate role;
- the meeting actually takes place;
- required qualification information is captured;
- Sales accepts the resulting opportunity;
- another clearly defined condition is met.

The exact criteria depend on the business. What matters is that the quality standard is defined **before** employees start performing against it. Otherwise, managers can end up deciding retrospectively which meetings were “good enough” to count.

#### Booked meetings and completed meetings are different

Even a simple distinction such as booked versus completed meetings can materially change the incentive.

Suppose an SDR books 15 meetings. Five prospects do not attend.

If compensation is based on **meetings booked**, all 15 may count.

If it is based on **meetings completed**, only 10 count.

Neither rule is universally correct.

A booked-meeting incentive rewards the SDR for securing the commitment. A completed-meeting incentive transfers some of the no-show risk to the SDR. The company needs to decide which event represents the result it wants to reward.

The important part is making that event explicit.

### Demos conducted

Demos can be useful activity metrics when they represent a meaningful stage in the sales process.

But the same question applies: what does conducting more demos tell you?

If a demo occurs only after strong qualification, demo volume may correlate closely with commercial progress. If almost any prospect can receive a demo, volume alone may tell you much less.

Sales managers can therefore use demo metrics alongside:

- opportunity progression;
- proposal rates;
- win rates;
- eventual revenue.

The closer the activity is to a clearly defined commercial handoff, the easier it becomes to evaluate whether the metric is suitable for incentives.

### Opportunities created

Opportunity creation sits somewhere between activity and outcome.

For an SDR, creating an accepted qualified opportunity may be close to the primary result the role is expected to deliver.

For an Account Executive, creating opportunities may simply be one stage on the way to revenue.

The definition matters enormously.

If employees can create CRM opportunities freely, paying for opportunity count can encourage more records rather than better pipeline.

If an opportunity must satisfy defined qualification criteria and be accepted by the next responsible role, it becomes a stronger incentive measure.

Again, the number itself is only part of the design. The **event that makes the activity eligible** matters just as much.

## Activity quality matters when teams hand work to each other

Activity incentives often affect another team.

1. An SDR creates meetings for an Account Executive.
2. Marketing creates leads for Sales.
3. Sales hands customers to implementation or Customer Success.

If one team is paid for producing volume while the next team requires quality, the incentive can create friction at the handoff.

Suppose an SDR receives variable pay for every meeting while the Account Executive is paid only on closed revenue.

- The SDR benefits from increasing meeting volume.
- The AE benefits from spending time on opportunities likely to close.

Those interests can work together when the qualification standard is clear. They can conflict when it is not.

This is one reason activity incentives should be reviewed across the customer journey rather than only within the team receiving the incentive. Our guide to [aligning incentive compensation across GTM teams](https://www.bentega.io/blog/how-to-align-compensation-plans-with-goals-and-strategy) looks at those handoffs in more detail.

## Activity targets do not automatically need an incentive

A Sales manager can set an activity expectation without putting money behind it.

For example, the team might use a working expectation around:

- prospecting time;
- relevant conversations;
- customer follow-ups;
- pipeline creation.

Those measures can support coaching and performance management. Variable pay can remain tied to a different outcome. This distinction matters because compensation is only one mechanism for managing performance.

If every expectation becomes a bonus component, the incentive plan can quickly turn into a financial version of the employee's entire job description.

## When activity metrics can make sense for incentives

Activity-based variable pay becomes easier to justify when the activity itself is an important result of the role.

An SDR is a good example.

If the SDR's job is to create qualified meetings or accepted opportunities for Sales, that handoff may represent the clearest measurable result of their work.

The company can then define:

- **what activity counts**
- **what quality standard applies**
- **when credit is earned**
- **what happens if the activity is later rejected**
- **who owns the approval**

That is very different from paying every salesperson simply for making more calls.

The closer the activity is to the actual responsibility of the role, the stronger the case for using it in compensation.

## Activity metrics can also work in short-term incentives

Sometimes the company wants a temporary increase in a specific Sales behaviour.

For example:

- prospecting into a new segment;
- booking meetings for a product launch;
- completing customer outreach for an expansion campaign;
- generating qualified opportunities before a defined deadline.

A short-term [SPIF](https://www.bentega.io/spif) may be more appropriate than permanently changing the core compensation plan.

This allows the company to define:

- the activity;
- eligible participants;
- campaign period;
- qualification criteria;
- payout;
- maximum payout;
- review rules.

When the campaign ends, the core compensation structure does not need to carry the temporary activity metric indefinitely.

## Worked example: meeting volume versus accepted opportunities

Consider two possible SDR plans.

### Plan A: booked meetings

The SDR earns:

**€75 per booked meeting**

During the month:

**20 meetings booked**

Payout:

**20 × €75 = €1,500**

Sales later accepts 8 of those meetings as qualified opportunities.

### Plan B: accepted opportunities

The SDR earns:

**€150 per Sales-accepted opportunity**

During the same month:

**8 accepted opportunities**

Payout:

**8 × €150 = €1,200**

These examples are illustrative. Neither plan is automatically better.

Plan A puts more emphasis on generating meetings and may give the SDR greater control over the outcome.

Plan B moves the incentive closer to pipeline quality, but it also makes the SDR dependent on how consistently Sales applies the acceptance criteria.

That creates another governance question. If Sales acceptance determines someone's pay, the company should define the acceptance standard clearly enough that similar opportunities receive similar treatment.

## Be careful when the next team controls the incentive result

Qualification mechanisms can improve activity incentives, but they can also move control away from the participant.

Suppose an SDR earns variable pay only when an Account Executive marks the opportunity as accepted. Now the AE's decision affects the SDR's compensation. That may be entirely appropriate.

But the company should consider:

- Is the acceptance criterion defined?
- Can the SDR see why an opportunity was rejected?
- Are different AEs applying the same standard?
- Can an acceptance decision be changed later?
- Who resolves disagreements?
- When does the activity become final for payout?

A quality control is useful only if the process behind it is sufficiently consistent.

## Avoid incentivising activity that employees can create without value

Whenever an activity affects compensation, ask how easily the employee can increase the number without increasing the intended commercial outcome.

For calls:

Can a rep make many very short calls?

For emails:

Can automated sequences increase the count?

For meetings:

Can weak-fit prospects be scheduled more easily than strong-fit prospects?

For opportunities:

Can CRM records be created before meaningful qualification?

For demos:

Can demos be scheduled earlier in the process simply to increase the metric?

This does not mean employees will intentionally manipulate the system. The point is that people naturally respond to the incentives and definitions they are given. The plan should make productive behaviour the easiest way to improve the incentive result.

Our article on [misaligned incentive metrics](https://www.bentega.io/blog/misaligned-metrics-how-they-can-derail-your-business) covers this behavioural question in more depth.

## Do not use one activity benchmark for every salesperson

Activity also depends heavily on context.

Two sellers can perform the same role but face different:

- territories;
- account sizes;
- customer segments;
- sales cycles;
- channels;
- product complexity;
- levels of inbound demand.

A salesperson working a smaller number of large enterprise accounts may naturally make fewer calls than someone selling into a high-volume SMB segment. That does not automatically mean the first person is underperforming.

Historical activity data can provide useful context, but activity expectations should still reflect the operating model.

A universal “50 calls per day” target is only meaningful if 50 calls represents useful Sales activity for that particular role and sales motion.

## Look at conversion between activities

Raw activity counts become much more informative when combined with progression.

For example:

**100 calls**

→ **25 conversations**

→ **10 meetings**

→ **6 qualified opportunities**

→ **2 closed-won deals**

Now managers can ask more useful questions.

- If calls increase but conversations do not, prospecting quality or targeting may be the issue.
- If conversations are healthy but meetings are low, discovery or positioning may need attention.
- If meetings convert poorly into opportunities, qualification may be weak.
- If opportunities are healthy but few deals close, the problem may sit further down the sales process.

This is usually a better use of activity data than simply asking everyone to increase the first number in the funnel.

## Activity metrics are especially useful for coaching

Outcome metrics tell managers who hit the number. Activity and conversion data can help explain why.

Suppose two Account Executives both generate €80,000 against a €100,000 monthly target. Their final result is identical.

But the underlying process may be completely different. One has strong pipeline generation but a low conversion rate. The other has excellent conversion but too little pipeline. Giving both people the same instruction to “sell more” misses the difference.

Activity metrics allow the manager to focus on the part of the process most likely to improve the result. That is valuable even when none of those activity measures affect commission.

## Keep coaching metrics separate from compensation metrics

This distinction is worth making explicit in Sales reporting.

A dashboard might contain:

### Compensation metrics

- new ARR;
- eligible revenue;
- sales target attainment;
- qualified opportunities for an SDR.

### Coaching and diagnostic metrics

- calls;
- emails;
- conversations;
- meetings;
- conversion between stages;
- sales cycle;
- pipeline coverage.

The exact classification depends on the role. The important point is that a metric does not need to affect compensation to be useful.

Our [Sales KPI guide](https://www.bentega.io/blog/driving-sales-success-harnessing-sales-kpis-and-incentives-for-optimal-performance) covers this distinction across the wider Sales performance model.

## Do not add activity metrics simply because an outcome metric is lagging

Imagine Sales misses its revenue target. Management discovers that outbound activity has fallen.

It may be tempting to add call volume or meeting count to the compensation plan immediately.

That might improve activity. But first ask why activity declined.

- Perhaps territories changed.
- Perhaps the reps are spending more time on larger opportunities.
- Perhaps administrative work increased.
- Perhaps inbound demand shifted.
- Perhaps the existing compensation plan makes prospecting unattractive compared with managing existing pipeline.

The metric identifies something to investigate. It does not automatically identify the appropriate incentive response.

## Use activity and outcome metrics together when testing incentive design

Suppose a new Sales incentive launches in January.

Revenue increases. That is encouraging.

Now look at the operating measures around it.

- Did activity change?
- Did opportunity quality change?
- Did conversion rates change?
- Did discounting change?
- Did the Sales cycle change?
- Did the customer mix change?

Those metrics can help the company understand **how** the incentive affected behaviour. They do not all need to be added to the compensation calculation. This separation allows management to monitor more information than the employee has to optimise financially.

## Review activity incentives when the sales motion changes

A metric that makes sense today may become less useful as the sales process changes.

For example, a company may move:

- from inbound to outbound;
- from SMB to enterprise;
- from transactional sales to consultative sales;
- from one product to several;
- from individual selling to team selling.

The number and type of activities required to produce revenue may change considerably.

When the commercial motion changes, review whether existing activity targets and incentives still represent valuable work.

Do not keep paying for an activity simply because it was easy to measure under the previous model.

## How many activity metrics should you use?

There is no universal number.

For management purposes, Sales can track several activities if they help explain performance. For compensation, the standard should be higher. Every additional activity metric should have a distinct reason to affect pay.

If calls, emails, meetings and opportunities all appear in the incentive formula, ask whether the plan is rewarding four genuinely different outcomes or simply paying several times for progress through the same funnel.

Our guide to [how many KPIs an incentive plan should use](https://www.bentega.io/blog/how-many-metrics-should-you-track) covers this question in more detail.

## Define the operating rules before activity affects pay

If an activity is going to determine variable pay, define the surrounding rules clearly.

That includes:

- eligible participants;
- activity definition;
- quality criteria;
- source data;
- performance period;
- crediting event;
- effective dates;
- payout rule;
- threshold or maximum where relevant;
- rejection rules;
- exception handling;
- review responsibilities;
- approval process;
- payout timing.

For example, “€75 per qualified meeting” is not a complete rule until everyone understands what **qualified** means and when the meeting becomes eligible for compensation.

Our guide to [integrating KPIs into compensation plans](https://www.bentega.io/blog/integrating-kpis-into-compensation-plans-for-better-results) covers the full operating workflow.

## How Bentega supports Sales activity-based incentives

Bentega supports commissions, quota-based incentives, bonuses, SPIFs and KPI-based Sales incentives as part of the broader Sales and RevOps incentive workflow.

Companies can define plan rules, eligibility, thresholds and KPI logic, calculate incentive outcomes, review exceptions and route results through approval before downstream payout processing. Salespeople and managers can also get clearer visibility into attainment and incentive results.

If a company decides that a defined Sales activity should affect variable pay, that activity can form part of the performance logic used by the incentive plan, provided the required performance data is available to the process.

[See how Bentega supports Sales and RevOps teams](https://www.bentega.io/solutions/sales-revops-incentive-compensation).

## Frequently asked questions

### What are Sales activity metrics?

 Sales activity metrics measure actions performed during the Sales process, such as calls, emails, conversations, meetings, demos, follow-ups and opportunities created.

They are often used as leading indicators of future commercial performance.

### Which Sales activity metrics should I track?

 Track the activities that help explain progress through your own sales process.

For one team that may include conversations, meetings and qualified opportunities. Another sales motion may require different measures.

The metric should help management understand performance rather than exist simply because the CRM can count it.

### Should Sales activity affect compensation?

 Sometimes. Activity-based compensation is easier to justify when producing a clearly defined activity or handoff is an important result of the role, such as qualified opportunities generated by an SDR.

For many closing roles, activity metrics may be more useful for coaching while compensation remains connected to commercial outcomes.

### Should salespeople be paid for meetings booked?

 They can be, particularly where meeting generation is a core responsibility.

 The company should define what qualifies, whether the meeting must take place, whether another team must accept it and when the meeting becomes eligible for payout.

### Should salespeople be paid for calls?

 Call volume can be incentivised, but the company should understand that the direct incentive is to produce more calls.

If quality and downstream progression matter, those factors may need to be reflected in the activity definition or monitored separately.

### What is the difference between an activity metric and an outcome metric?

 An activity metric measures something the salesperson does, such as making a call or conducting a meeting.

An outcome metric measures a result, such as revenue, new ARR or gross margin.

Activities may contribute to outcomes without guaranteeing them.

### Are Sales activity metrics leading indicators?

 They often are. Calls, conversations, meetings and opportunities occur before the revenue result, so they can provide earlier information about whether the sales process is producing enough activity.

### Can activity metrics be used in a SPIF?

 Yes. A short-term campaign may reward a clearly defined Sales activity when the company wants temporary focus on a particular behaviour.

 The activity, qualification rules, participants, dates and payout should be defined before the campaign begins.

### Should every activity in the CRM become a KPI?

 No. CRM data can support management, forecasting and coaching without every measure becoming a formal KPI or compensation component.

### How should activity-based incentives be implemented?

 Define exactly what counts, where the data comes from, when credit is earned, how quality is assessed and how the resulting payout is reviewed and approved.

See our [guide to integrating KPIs into compensation plans](https://www.bentega.io/blog/integrating-kpis-into-compensation-plans-for-better-results) for the broader process.

NEXT STEP

## Track activity to understand the process. Incentivise it deliberately.

Sales activity data is valuable because it gives managers an earlier and more detailed view of how commercial performance is developing.

Calls, conversations, meetings, demos and opportunities can reveal problems that the final revenue number cannot explain on its own.

That does not mean every activity should determine variable pay.

Use activity broadly for diagnosis, forecasting and coaching. Attach compensation only when the activity represents a meaningful result of the role, the quality standard is clear and the company is comfortable with the behaviour the incentive encourages.

The distinction allows Sales to benefit from detailed performance data without turning the compensation plan into a reward system for every action recorded in the CRM.

For the wider framework around selecting Sales incentive metrics, read our [Sales KPI guide](https://www.bentega.io/blog/driving-sales-success-harnessing-sales-kpis-and-incentives-for-optimal-performance).

Sales Activity Metrics: What to Track and Incentivise

[KPIs & Metrics](https://www.bentega.io/blog/tag/kpis-metrics)

## Related posts

[![sales KPIs and incentives](https://www.bentega.io/hs-fs/hubfs/Bloggbanner%20-%20Driving%20sales%20success%20(Bloggbanner).png?height=200&name=Bloggbanner%20-%20Driving%20sales%20success%20(Bloggbanner).png)](https://www.bentega.io/blog/driving-sales-success-harnessing-sales-kpis-and-incentives-for-optimal-performance)

## [Sales KPIs: which metrics should affect compensation?](https://www.bentega.io/blog/driving-sales-success-harnessing-sales-kpis-and-incentives-for-optimal-performance)

[![Incentive compensation metrics workflow showing business goals, metrics, source data, payout logic, and approval](https://www.bentega.io/hs-fs/hubfs/Incentive%20compensation%20metrics%20workflow%20Bentega.png?height=200&name=Incentive%20compensation%20metrics%20workflow%20Bentega.png)](https://www.bentega.io/blog/performance-metrics-for-incentive-compensation-what-to-measure)

## [Incentive compensation metrics by role: what should you measure?](https://www.bentega.io/blog/performance-metrics-for-incentive-compensation-what-to-measure)

[![How many metrics should we track](https://www.bentega.io/hs-fs/hubfs/AI-Generated%20Media/Images/illustration%20on%20how%20many%20metrics%20you%20should%20track.jpeg?height=200&name=illustration%20on%20how%20many%20metrics%20you%20should%20track.jpeg)](https://www.bentega.io/blog/how-many-metrics-should-you-track)

## [How many KPIs should an incentive plan use?](https://www.bentega.io/blog/how-many-metrics-should-you-track)

---

[Follow us on LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/bentega) [Follow us on Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61564040605445) [Follow us on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/bentegasoftware/) [Follow us on YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSoZx0FpEf_zqKHdIzm1ftA)

---

- [Product](https://www.bentega.io/product)
- Solutions 
    - [By role](https://www.bentega.io/solutions) 
          - [CFOs & Finance](https://www.bentega.io/solutions/cfos-finance-incentive-control)
          - [Sales & RevOps](https://www.bentega.io/solutions/sales-revops-incentive-compensation)
          - [HR & People](https://www.bentega.io/solutions/hr-people-variable-pay-governance)
          - [GTM Teams](https://www.bentega.io/solutions/gtm-leaders-incentive-compensation)
- [Pricing](https://www.bentega.io/pricing)
- [Services](https://www.bentega.io/services)
- Resources 
    - [Guides](https://www.bentega.io/compensation-sales-performance-guides-free-downloads-bentega) 
          - [Incentive Compensation](https://www.bentega.io/incentive-compensation)
          - [Incentive Compensation Management (ICM)](https://www.bentega.io/incentive-compensation-management)
          - [Sales Compensation](https://www.bentega.io/sales-compensation)
          - [Sales Commission](https://www.bentega.io/sales-commission)
          - [Commission Structures](https://www.bentega.io/sales-commission-structure)
          - [Bonus](https://www.bentega.io/bonus)
          - [Performance Pay](https://www.bentega.io/performance-pay)
          - [SPIF](https://www.bentega.io/spif)
          - [On-Target Earnings](https://www.bentega.io/on-target-earnings)
          - [KPIs and Metrics](https://www.bentega.io/kpis-and-metrics)
          - [Motivation](https://www.bentega.io/work-motivation)
          - [Incentive Compensation Governance](https://www.bentega.io/incentive-compensation-governance)
    - [Blog](https://www.bentega.io/blog)
    - [Glossary](https://www.bentega.io/glossary)
    - Tools 
          - [OTE Calculator](https://www.bentega.io/tools/ote-calculator)
          - [Sales Commission Calculator](https://www.bentega.io/sales-commission-calculator)
    - [Newsletter](https://www.bentega.io/newsletter)
- About 
    - [About Bentega](https://www.bentega.io/about)
    - [Contact Us](https://www.bentega.io/contact-us-bentega)
- [Log in](https://app.bentega.io)

[![Incentive Compensation Software by Bentega](https://www.bentega.io/hubfs/bentega%20logo%20footer.svg "Incentive Compensation Software by Bentega")](https://www.bentega.io/)

© 2026 Bentega | [Privacy Policy](https://www.bentega.io/privacy-policy) | [Cookie Policy](https://www.bentega.io/cookie-policy)

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "Andreas S. Loktu",
    "url" : "https://www.bentega.io/blog/author/andreas-s-loktu"
  },
  "dateModified" : "2026-10-22T13:48:12.857Z",
  "datePublished" : "2024-09-09T07:00:00.000Z",
  "headline" : "Sales Activity Metrics: What to Track and Incentivise",
  "image" : [ "https://www.bentega.io/hubfs/Canva%20images/Activity%20Metrics.png" ],
  "mainEntityOfPage" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.bentega.io/blog/boost-sales-the-importance-of-activity-metrics-in-saas-businesses",
    "@type" : "WebPage"
  },
  "publisher" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "url" : "https://www.bentega.io/hubfs/Bentega%20ICM%20platform%20logo.svg"
    },
    "name" : "Bentega"
  }
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://www.bentega.io/#organization",
  "@type" : "Organization",
  "areaServed" : "Global",
  "description" : "Bentega provides incentive compensation management software for commissions, bonuses, SPIFs, OTE-based payouts, KPI incentives, and broader variable pay.",
  "foundingLocation" : {
    "@type" : "Place",
    "name" : "Norway"
  },
  "knowsAbout" : [ "Incentive compensation management", "Sales commissions", "Bonus plans", "SPIF campaigns", "On-target earnings", "KPI-based incentives", "Variable pay governance" ],
  "legalName" : "Bentega AS",
  "logo" : {
    "@type" : "ImageObject",
    "url" : "https://www.bentega.io/hubfs/bentega%20logo%20footer.svg"
  },
  "name" : "Bentega",
  "sameAs" : [ "https://www.linkedin.com/company/bentega", "https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61564040605445", "https://x.com/BentegaSoftware", "https://www.instagram.com/bentegasoftware/", "https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSoZx0FpEf_zqKHdIzm1ftA" ],
  "url" : "https://www.bentega.io/"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@id" : "https://www.bentega.io/#website",
  "@type" : "WebSite",
  "inLanguage" : "en",
  "name" : "Bentega",
  "publisher" : {
    "@id" : "https://www.bentega.io/#organization"
  },
  "url" : "https://www.bentega.io/"
}
```

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity" : [ ]
}
```